Lot Split Quantity Conservation
Check whether the amounts in your parent lots and child-lot receipts agree.
Warehouse exceptions
Find possible duplicate entries in your label-print logs and receipt IDs.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Duplicate-label candidate groups.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Label-print logs and receipt IDs. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Warehouse Label Reprint Trace skill. Review the attached records: label-print logs and receipt IDs. Prepare this result: duplicate-label candidate groups. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It groups records with matching values. You review the proposed groups before deciding whether they describe the same event.
Label-print logs and receipt IDs.
For this task, keep one review row for each receipt + label signature. Record printed identifier, reprint event, and physical receipt. Keep the source location beside each value.
Preserve expected, received, damaged, quarantined, and available quantities separately. Model both endpoints of a transfer and each unit conversion.
Require explicit carton or pallet factors. Keep ownership, location, and disposition distinct. Never correct inventory from an inferred match.
A repeated signature is a candidate duplicate. Legitimate repeat events can have the same content. Do not delete, merge, or accuse a party automatically.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Sample record | printed identifier: signature-A |
|---|---|
| Sample record | printed identifier: signature-A |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "r1", "key": "receipt + label signature / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"printed identifier": "signature-A"}}{"id": "r2", "key": "receipt + label signature / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"printed identifier": "signature-A"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with label-print logs and receipt IDs. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use warehouse, SKU, lot or serial, movement ID to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Group exact matching values and report duplicate candidates. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: duplicate-label candidate groups. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.