Video Shot Release Form Coverage
Check your shot list and release inventory for missing supporting records.
Audio and video production
Find where your transcript speaker map and caption file disagree.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Inconsistent speaker labels.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Transcript speaker map and caption file. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Video Caption Speaker Attribution Check skill. Review the attached records: transcript speaker map and caption file. Prepare this result: inconsistent speaker labels. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It puts records for the same item side by side. It keeps both original values when they differ, so you can check the source.
Transcript speaker map and caption file.
For this task, keep one review row for each caption cue + speaker field. Record approved speaker map, caption attribution, and timecode. Keep the source location beside each value.
Keep feedback tied to the exact cut and timebase. Trace licenses, releases, approvals, delivered formats, and media copies.
A changed edit invalidates old timecode assumptions. An asset receipt does not establish all distribution rights.
A changed value does not show which source is correct. Semantic equivalence and identity aliases need an explicit mapping and review.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | approved speaker map: source-A |
|---|---|
| Record to check | approved speaker map: source-B |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "caption cue + speaker field / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"approved speaker map": "source-A"}}{"id": "o1", "key": "caption cue + speaker field / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"approved speaker map": "source-B"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with transcript speaker map and caption file. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use project, cut version, asset, timecode, rights scope to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Match each item, then compare its supplied values. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: inconsistent speaker labels. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.