Veterinary Estimate Consent Diff
See what changed in your estimate revisions and approvals.
Veterinary office administration
Check your submitted tests and returned reports for missing supporting records.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Missing reports without clinical interpretation.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Submitted tests and returned reports. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Veterinary Lab Result Receipt Tracker skill. Review the attached records: submitted tests and returned reports. Prepare this result: missing reports without clinical interpretation. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It lists the evidence each item needs, then looks for a matching record. Missing records and unclear matches stay in the report.
Submitted tests and returned reports.
For this task, keep one review row for each test request + report. Record submission ID, animal ID, and returned report reference. Keep the source location beside each value.
Match the animal and owner separately. Preserve microchip IDs and document dates. Use the supplied facility or insurer checklist when checking records.
Distinguish record completeness from medical validity. Suppression, ownership transfer, and vaccine suitability need the responsible staff member.
A matching key proves only that a supplied record exists. Inspect its content and required fields before calling the requirement satisfied.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | One required supporting record |
|---|---|
| Observed | No records supplied |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "test request + report / SYNTHETIC-001"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with submitted tests and returned reports. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use animal ID, owner ID, visit or referral, document type to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Compare required items with observed evidence using exact keys. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: missing reports without clinical interpretation. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.