Customer Credit Balance Evidence
Turn your receivables and credit notes into a review with clear source references.
Month-end evidence
Check your supplier statements and AP ledger for missing supporting records.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Listed bills missing internally.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Supplier statements and AP ledger. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Supplier Statement Unrecorded Invoice skill. Review the attached records: supplier statements and AP ledger. Prepare this result: listed bills missing internally. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It lists the evidence each item needs, then looks for a matching record. Missing records and unclear matches stay in the report.
Supplier statements and AP ledger.
For this task, keep one review row for each supplier statement line + invoice. Record supplier reference, internal bill, and missing entry. Keep the source location beside each value.
Maintain source links for receipts, statements, accruals, reversals, and adjustments. Preserve the exact close snapshot and later changes.
Do not fill an unexplained balance with an invented entry. Separate timing differences from amounts that lack evidence.
A matching key proves only that a supplied record exists. Inspect its content and required fields before calling the requirement satisfied.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | One required supporting record |
|---|---|
| Observed | No records supplied |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "supplier statement line + invoice / SYNTHETIC-001"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with supplier statements and AP ledger. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use entity, account, period, journal or transaction ID, currency to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Compare required items with observed evidence using exact keys. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: listed bills missing internally. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.