Journal Table Total Recheck
Check whether the amounts in your supplied tables agree.
Academic submission checks
Check that the files listed in your file folder and final-version register are present.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Ambiguous submission versions.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
File folder and final-version register. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Submission File Version Manifest skill. Review the attached records: file folder and final-version register. Prepare this result: ambiguous submission versions. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It compares the attachment list with the files in your chosen folder. It reports missing files and checks file fingerprints when you supply them.
File folder and final-version register.
For this task, keep one review row for each submission item + file. Record approved revision, supplied path, and hash. Keep the source location beside each value.
Compare the submitted files with the supplied journal requirements and author-approved metadata. Link each reported number or declaration to its source.
Formatting and arithmetic checks do not establish research validity. Mark unverified author claims and preserve unresolved reviewer comments.
A hash or non-empty file does not prove PDF, image, Office, audio, video, or archive validity. Use an available format-specific tool and record its result separately. The helper labels format validation as not performed.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Sample record | path: missing.txt |
|---|
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "r1", "key": "submission item + file / SYNTHETIC-001", "path": "missing.txt", "sha256": "8ac3f2abe47c6058d082c513928b1f40f4eb82a841e5c09c159c03ea3ff5d9d6"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with file folder and final-version register. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use manuscript version, journal rule version, figure/table/reference ID to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Check listed files inside the chosen folder and compare supplied hashes where present. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: ambiguous submission versions. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.