School Club Room Booking Conflict
Find overlapping periods in your club schedules and room reservations.
School administration
Find possible duplicate entries in your request logs.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Families receiving duplicate administrative requests.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Request logs. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the School Office Repeated Form Request Map skill. Review the attached records: request logs. Prepare this result: families receiving duplicate administrative requests. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It groups records with matching values. You review the proposed groups before deciding whether they describe the same event.
Request logs.
For this task, keep one review row for each family + request signature. Record form type, request date, and separate request occurrence. Keep the source location beside each value.
Use school-approved rosters and checklists. Distinguish a payment from consent, attendance from booking, and a request from an approved arrangement.
Preserve pickup permissions and contact versions. Report missing evidence to staff rather than making participation decisions.
A repeated signature is a candidate duplicate. Legitimate repeat events can have the same content. Do not delete, merge, or accuse a party automatically.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Sample record | form type: signature-A |
|---|---|
| Sample record | form type: signature-A |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "r1", "key": "family + request signature / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"form type": "signature-A"}}{"id": "r2", "key": "family + request signature / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"form type": "signature-A"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with request logs. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use student ID, event ID, form version, roster date to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Group exact matching values and report duplicate candidates. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: families receiving duplicate administrative requests. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.