Expired Price Quote Purchase Check
Check dates in your quote validity dates and orders against the allowed periods.
Restaurant purchasing
Find where your scale tickets and catch-weight invoices disagree.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Billed-weight differences.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Scale tickets and catch-weight invoices. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Restaurant Catch-Weight Recheck skill. Review the attached records: scale tickets and catch-weight invoices. Prepare this result: billed-weight differences. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It puts records for the same item side by side. It keeps both original values when they differ, so you can check the source.
Scale tickets and catch-weight invoices.
For this task, keep one review row for each delivery line + weight. Record scale reading, billed weight, unit, and tare rule. Keep the source location beside each value.
Normalize purchase quantities using sourced pack size and units. Keep price, credit, free goods, substitution, waste, and inter-location transfer evidence distinct.
Compare like-for-like products and dates. A different pack can hide a unit-price increase. Use approved ingredient and food-handling records.
A changed value does not show which source is correct. Semantic equivalence and identity aliases need an explicit mapping and review.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | scale reading: source-A |
|---|---|
| Record to check | scale reading: source-B |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "delivery line + weight / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"scale reading": "source-A"}}{"id": "o1", "key": "delivery line + weight / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"scale reading": "source-B"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with scale tickets and catch-weight invoices. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use supplier, product, pack specification, invoice line, location to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Match each item, then compare its supplied values. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: billed-weight differences. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.