Manufacturing Certificate Data Copy Check
Find where your release certificate and inspection source disagree.
Manufacturing quality records
See what changed in your record versions and timestamps.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Changes requiring reviewer explanation.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Record versions and timestamps. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Quality Record Revision Backfill Audit skill. Review the attached records: record versions and timestamps. Prepare this result: changes requiring reviewer explanation. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It compares the earlier and later records. It separates added, removed, and changed items and keeps a reference to each source.
Record versions and timestamps.
For this task, keep one review row for each quality record field + revision. Record prior value, revised value, edit time, and explanation. Keep the source location beside each value.
Link nonconformance, containment, disposition, rework, inspection, and effectiveness evidence. Preserve the applicable procedure and calibration versions.
Do not release material or claim product conformity from incomplete records. Keep reviewer authority explicit.
A change can be intentional. The engine does not determine approval, business impact, or which version should be used.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | prior value: source-A |
|---|---|
| Record to check | prior value: source-B |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "quality record field + revision / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"prior value": "source-A"}}{"id": "o1", "key": "quality record field + revision / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"prior value": "source-B"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with record versions and timestamps. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use product, lot or serial, NCR/CAPA, process revision to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Compare the baseline with the later version using exact keys. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: changes requiring reviewer explanation. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.