PO Deposit Final Bill Offset
Check whether the amounts in your advance payments and final invoice agree.
Purchase order matching
Find totals in your one PO and multiple invoices that exceed the limits you supply.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Cumulative quantity excess.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
One PO and multiple invoices. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the PO Split Invoice Overbilling Detector skill. Review the attached records: one PO and multiple invoices. Prepare this result: cumulative quantity excess. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It adds the amounts for the same item and unit, then checks the total against your limit. The report shows the amount above that limit.
One PO and multiple invoices.
For this task, keep one review row for each PO line + unit. Record authorized quantity, all billed quantities, and tolerance. Keep the source location beside each value.
Trace partial receipts, split invoices, deposits, returns, credits, and amendments. Distinguish quantity variance from price variance.
Use supplied tolerances and unit conversions. A three-way match is evidence for review, not payment authorization.
An amount below the bound is not proof of eligibility, correctness, or complete allocation. Negative values need a documented meaning.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | amount: 100.00; unit: example units |
|---|---|
| Record to check | amount: 125.00; unit: example units |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"amount": "100.00", "id": "e1", "key": "PO line + unit / SYNTHETIC-001", "unit": "synthetic-unit"}{"amount": "125.00", "id": "o1", "key": "PO line + unit / SYNTHETIC-001", "unit": "synthetic-unit"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with one PO and multiple invoices. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use supplier, PO, line, receipt, invoice revision, unit to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Add records with the same key and unit, then compare their total with the supplied limit. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: cumulative quantity excess. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.