Lab Chain-of-Custody Missing Signoff
Check your transfer records for missing supporting records.
Research data administration
Trace the links between items in your aliquot records and parent register.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Broken parent references.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Aliquot records and parent register. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Lab Sample Parent-Child Lineage skill. Review the attached records: aliquot records and parent register. Prepare this result: broken parent references. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It follows the links you supply between items. Missing links and circular chains stay visible, so you can see what needs another check.
Aliquot records and parent register.
For this task, keep one review row for each sample + parent node. Record parent sample, aliquot ID, and explicit root or missing parent. Keep the source location beside each value.
Maintain sample identity, lineage, transfers, reagent lots, and data dictionary versions. Preserve blinded identifiers without inferring hidden identities.
Do not infer consent scope or recover missing measurements. Treat frozen dataset changes as evidence requiring researcher review.
Graph consistency does not establish full traceability, custody, quantity conservation, or dependency completion. Check those facts separately in the source-linked report.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Sample record | node: node-A; parents: node-B |
|---|---|
| Sample record | node: node-B; parents: node-A |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "r1", "key": "sample + parent node / SYNTHETIC-001", "node": "node-A", "parents": ["node-B"]}{"id": "r2", "key": "sample + parent node / SYNTHETIC-001", "node": "node-B", "parents": ["node-A"]}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with aliquot records and parent register. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use study, sample, aliquot, run, location, protocol version to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Follow the supplied parent links and report missing parents or cycles. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: broken parent references. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.