Home Care Handoff Equipment Checklist
Check your approved plan checklist and visit notes for missing supporting records.
Home care scheduling
Bring conflicting details in your contact forms and scheduler notes into one review.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Conflicting contact instructions.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Contact forms and scheduler notes. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Home Care Contact Instruction Conflicts skill. Review the attached records: contact forms and scheduler notes. Prepare this result: conflicting contact instructions. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It groups statements about the same item. Different values stay visible together, with their original sources.
Contact forms and scheduler notes.
For this task, keep one review row for each client + contact instruction. Record approved contact, scheduler instruction, and effective period. Keep the source location beside each value.
Compare planned visits, verified visits, authorizations, time records, and notifications. Record coverage attempts independently from successful coverage.
Use supplied travel durations and credential scope. A scheduling check does not establish that required care was provided.
The engine does not decide which source has authority. Establish that from supplied records and flag unresolved authority.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Sample record | approved contact: assertion-A |
|---|---|
| Sample record | approved contact: assertion-B |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "r1", "key": "client + contact instruction / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"approved contact": "assertion-A"}}{"id": "r2", "key": "client + contact instruction / SYNTHETIC-001", "value": {"approved contact": "assertion-B"}}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with contact forms and scheduler notes. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use client ID, caregiver ID, visit ID, branch, time zone to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Group records by item and identify different supplied values. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: conflicting contact instructions. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.