Weekend Directive Timeline Builder
Put the events in your messages and site attendance into date order.
Construction change orders
Check your authorization matrix and messages for missing supporting records.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Instructions from unlisted approvers.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Authorization matrix and messages. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Change Instruction Sender Authority Map skill. Review the attached records: authorization matrix and messages. Prepare this result: instructions from unlisted approvers. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It lists the evidence each item needs, then looks for a matching record. Missing records and unclear matches stay in the report.
Authorization matrix and messages.
For this task, keep one review row for each instruction + authority role. Record sender, named authority, delegated scope, and effective date. Keep the source location beside each value.
Keep original scope, extra work, instruction authority, quantities, and charge periods distinct. A site instruction is not an approval to pay. Link each extra-work item to its contract or drawing reference.
Check labor ticket dates, material credits, markup order, retention basis, and currency before comparing totals.
A matching key proves only that a supplied record exists. Inspect its content and required fields before calling the requirement satisfied.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | One required supporting record |
|---|---|
| Observed | No records supplied |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "instruction + authority role / SYNTHETIC-001"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with authorization matrix and messages. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use project, change ID, trade, instruction revision to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Compare required items with observed evidence using exact keys. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: instructions from unlisted approvers. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.