Seat Change Proration Evidence Sheet
Recheck the figures in your seat events and supplied billing rules against the rules you supply.
Subscription billing
Check whether the amounts in your old/new ledgers agree.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Credits lost or duplicated during transfer.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Old/new ledgers. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Billing Migration Historical Credit Trace skill. Review the attached records: old/new ledgers. Prepare this result: credits lost or duplicated during transfer. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It adds the amounts for each item and compares the total with your starting figure. The report shows the difference and its source records.
Old/new ledgers.
For this task, keep one review row for each customer + migration credit currency. Record old credit, migrated credit, and documented adjustments. Keep the source location beside each value.
Use effective dates for seats, usage, pauses, price overrides, and credits. Preserve invoice cutoff and late-arriving events.
Require the approved proration rule, day-count convention, and rounding tolerance. Keep contract commitments separate from cash payments.
The engine cannot establish that all transactions were exported. It does not perform currency conversion, infer missing balances, or post adjustments.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | amount: 100.00; unit: example units |
|---|---|
| Record to check | amount: 125.00; unit: example units |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"amount": "100.00", "id": "e1", "key": "customer + migration credit currency / SYNTHETIC-001", "unit": "synthetic-unit"}{"amount": "125.00", "id": "o1", "key": "customer + migration credit currency / SYNTHETIC-001", "unit": "synthetic-unit"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with old/new ledgers. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use customer, subscription, billing period, plan version, currency to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Add the observed amounts and compare the total with the supplied baseline. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: credits lost or duplicated during transfer. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.