Website Page Count Scope Reconciler
Check your signed sitemap and delivered routes for missing supporting records.
Agency scope control
Check your vendor receipts and client approvals for missing supporting records.
A downloadable skill for your AI agent.
Costs lacking approval references.
Source references, missing information, and questions to review stay with the findings.
Open your download and follow the start guide. Use an AI agent that can load skill files and run the included tools.
Vendor receipts and client approvals. Confirm the case and period you want to check.
Copy the request below into your agent. Add the files and any task details it needs.
Check the findings against the original records. Choose where to save the report and follow up on open questions.
Use the Agency Third-Party Cost Approval Link skill. Review the attached records: vendor receipts and client approvals. Prepare this result: costs lacking approval references. Include a source reference for each finding. List missing information and questions that need my review. Ask me to confirm the scope and where to save the report before you start.
It lists the evidence each item needs, then looks for a matching record. Missing records and unclear matches stay in the report.
Vendor receipts and client approvals.
For this task, keep one review row for each vendor cost + approval. Record receipt, client approval, and cost scope. Keep the source location beside each value.
Compare requests and delivered work with the exact signed scope. Preserve exclusions, revision definitions, stakeholder authority, and acceptance evidence.
Do not infer that feedback authorizes extra billing. Record ambiguous revision versus new-deliverable cases for client review.
A matching key proves only that a supplied record exists. Inspect its content and required fields before calling the requirement satisfied.
This synthetic example shows the included check in use. Your agent uses its findings to complete your task report.
Synthetic example records
| Starting record | One required supporting record |
|---|---|
| Observed | No records supplied |
A difference needs review
This result comes from the checking tool in your download.
These are synthetic records from the bundled example.
{"id": "e1", "key": "vendor cost + approval / SYNTHETIC-001"}After purchase, extract the ZIP. Run these commands from the skill folder. Use a new output folder.
python3 scripts/checks.py
python3 scripts/audit.py assets/example.json \
--files-root assets/sample-files --output-dir example-result
Expected exit code: 1. Code 0 means no helper finding. Code 1 means a finding or review item. Code 2 means incomplete or invalid input.
The check uses the records you supply. Review each finding against the original documents.
Ask your agent to save the completed task report in a folder you choose. The report template includes the result, source references, missing information, and next actions.
Tonotes does not receive your work documents through this website. Documents you share with an AI service follow that service's storage settings.
US$11 includes one skill in a ZIP with 18 files. You receive the instructions and tools to run the task with your own records.
Use an agent that supports SKILL.md instructions and Python 3.10 or later with SQLite. Your AI-agent service is separate.
Start with vendor receipts and client approvals. Confirm the case, period, and source versions before the review.
Use client, project, deliverable, SOW revision, approval to keep records distinct. The agent records the original value, an exact quote, and the source location.
Compare required items with observed evidence using exact keys. Run the Python helper on the structured records. Check each finding against its source.
Prepare the task result: costs lacking approval references. Include missing evidence, unresolved questions, and the next action for each open item.
Eight synthetic cases check the tool locally. Live-agent accuracy on real documents has not been tested.